Web Security Overview
Unable to determine
No HTTP servers

This host doesn't seem to have any HTTP servers. We'll focus on evaluating the DNS and email configuration instead.

Email Security Overview
Supported and well configured
STARTTLS

All hosts that receive email need encryption to ensure confidentiality of email messages. Email servers thus need to support STARTTLS, as well as provide decent TLS configuration and correct certificates.

For all sites VERY IMPORTANT low EFFORT
Supported and well configured
SPF

Sender Policy Framework (SPF) enables organizations to designate servers that are allowed to send email messages on their behalf. With SPF in place, spam is easier to identify.

For important sites IMPORTANT low EFFORT
Supported and well configured
DMARC

Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) is a mechanism that allows organizations to specify how unauthenticated email (identified using SPF and DKIM) should be handled.

For important sites IMPORTANT low EFFORT

DNS Zone

The global DNS infrastructure is organized as a series of hierarchical DNS zones. The root zone hosts a number of global and country TLDs, which in turn host further zones that are delegated to their customers. Each organization that controls a zone can delegate parts of its namespace to other zones. In this test we perform detailed inspection of a DNS zone, but only if the host being tested matches the zone.

Test passed
Everything seems to be well configured. Well done.

Nameserver Names

Nameservers can be referred to by name and by address. In this section we show the names, which can appear in the NS records, the referrals from the parent zone, and the SOA record. In some situations, servers from the parent zone respond authoritatively, in which case we will include them in the list as well.

Nameserver Operational IPv4 IPv6 Sources
graham.ns.cloudflare.com. PRIMARY
108.162.193.171
172.64.33.171
173.245.59.171
2606:4700:58::adf5:3bab
2803:f800:50::6ca2:c1ab
2a06:98c1:50::ac40:21ab
The server is online. Name resolves to an IPv4 address. Name resolves to an IPv6 address. NS REFERRAL SOA
kristin.ns.cloudflare.com.
108.162.192.181
172.64.32.181
173.245.58.181
2606:4700:50::adf5:3ab5
2803:f800:50::6ca2:c0b5
2a06:98c1:50::ac40:20b5
The server is online. Name resolves to an IPv4 address. Name resolves to an IPv6 address. NS REFERRAL

Nameserver Addresses

This section shows the configuration of all discovered nameservers by their IP address. To find all applicable nameservers, we inspect the parent zone nameservers for names and glue and then the tested zone nameservers for NS records. We then resolve all discovered names to IP addresses. Finally, we test each address individually.

Nameserver Operational Authoritative Recursive UDP TCP Sources Payload Size
108.162.192.181
kristin.ns.cloudflare.com.
PTR: kristin.ns.cloudflare.com.
The server appears to be online. Nameserver provides authoritative responses Nameserver doesn't provide recursive service Nameserver responds to UDP queries Nameserver responds to TCP queries NAME 1232
108.162.193.171 PRIMARY
graham.ns.cloudflare.com.
PTR: graham.ns.cloudflare.com.
The server appears to be online. Nameserver provides authoritative responses Nameserver doesn't provide recursive service Nameserver responds to UDP queries Nameserver responds to TCP queries NAME 1232
172.64.32.181
kristin.ns.cloudflare.com.
PTR: kristin.ns.cloudflare.com.
The server appears to be online. Nameserver provides authoritative responses Nameserver doesn't provide recursive service Nameserver responds to UDP queries Nameserver responds to TCP queries NAME 1232
172.64.33.171 PRIMARY
graham.ns.cloudflare.com.
PTR: graham.ns.cloudflare.com.
The server appears to be online. Nameserver provides authoritative responses Nameserver doesn't provide recursive service Nameserver responds to UDP queries Nameserver responds to TCP queries NAME 1232
173.245.58.181
kristin.ns.cloudflare.com.
PTR: kristin.ns.cloudflare.com.
The server appears to be online. Nameserver provides authoritative responses Nameserver doesn't provide recursive service Nameserver responds to UDP queries Nameserver responds to TCP queries NAME 1232
173.245.59.171 PRIMARY
graham.ns.cloudflare.com.
PTR: graham.ns.cloudflare.com.
The server appears to be online. Nameserver provides authoritative responses Nameserver doesn't provide recursive service Nameserver responds to UDP queries Nameserver responds to TCP queries NAME 1232
2606:4700:50::adf5:3ab5
kristin.ns.cloudflare.com.
PTR: kristin.ns.cloudflare.com.
The server appears to be online. Nameserver provides authoritative responses Nameserver doesn't provide recursive service Nameserver responds to UDP queries Nameserver responds to TCP queries NAME 1232
2606:4700:58::adf5:3bab PRIMARY
graham.ns.cloudflare.com.
PTR: graham.ns.cloudflare.com.
The server appears to be online. Nameserver provides authoritative responses Nameserver doesn't provide recursive service Nameserver responds to UDP queries Nameserver responds to TCP queries NAME 1232
2803:f800:50::6ca2:c0b5
kristin.ns.cloudflare.com.
PTR: kristin.ns.cloudflare.com.
The server appears to be online. Nameserver provides authoritative responses Nameserver doesn't provide recursive service Nameserver responds to UDP queries Nameserver responds to TCP queries NAME 1232
2803:f800:50::6ca2:c1ab PRIMARY
graham.ns.cloudflare.com.
PTR: graham.ns.cloudflare.com.
The server appears to be online. Nameserver provides authoritative responses Nameserver doesn't provide recursive service Nameserver responds to UDP queries Nameserver responds to TCP queries NAME 1232
2a06:98c1:50::ac40:20b5
kristin.ns.cloudflare.com.
PTR: kristin.ns.cloudflare.com.
The server appears to be online. Nameserver provides authoritative responses Nameserver doesn't provide recursive service Nameserver responds to UDP queries Nameserver responds to TCP queries NAME 1232
2a06:98c1:50::ac40:21ab PRIMARY
graham.ns.cloudflare.com.
PTR: graham.ns.cloudflare.com.
The server appears to be online. Nameserver provides authoritative responses Nameserver doesn't provide recursive service Nameserver responds to UDP queries Nameserver responds to TCP queries NAME 1232

Start of Authority (SOA) Record

Start of Authority (SOA) records contain administrative information pertaining to one DNS zone, especially the configuration that's used for zone transfers between the primary nameserver and the secondaries. Only one SOA record should exist, with all nameservers providing the same information.

The domain name of the primary nameserver for the zone. Also known as MNAME.Primary nameserver graham.ns.cloudflare.com.
Email address of the persons responsible for this zone. Also known as RNAME.Admin email dns.cloudflare.com.
Zone serial or version number.Serial number -1918891265
The length of time secondary nameservers should wait before querying the primary for changes.Refresh interval 10,000 seconds (about 2 hours 46 minutes)
The length of time secondary nameservers should wait before querying an unresponsive primary again.Retry interval 2,400 seconds (about 40 minutes)
The length of time after which secondary nameservers should stop responding to queries for a zone, assuming no updates were obtained from the primary.Expire interval 604,800 seconds (about 7 days)
TTL for purposes of negative response caching. Negative cache TTL 1,800 seconds (about 30 minutes)
Time To Live (TTL) indicates for how long a record remains valid. SOA record TTL 1,800 seconds (about 30 minutes)

Analysis

Good
No problems detected with the zone configuration
Excellent. This DNS zone is in a good working order. No problems detected.

Backing DNS Queries

Below are all DNS queries we submitted during the zone inspection.

ID Server Transport Question Name Type Status

DNS Records

Correctly functioning name servers are necessary to hold and distribute information that's necessary for your domain name to operate correctly. Examples include converting names to IP addresses, determining where email should go, and so on. More recently, the DNS is being used to communicate email and other security policies.

Test passed
Everything seems to be well configured. Well done.

DNS Records

These are the results of individual DNS queries against your nameserver for common resource record types.

Name TTL Type Data
cornubot.se.     3600 DNSKEY 256 3 13 oJMRESz5E4gYzS/q6XDrvU1qMPYIjCWzJaOau8XNEZeqCYKD5ar0IRd8KqXXFJkqmVfRvMGPmM1x8fGAa2XhSA==            
cornubot.se.     3600 DNSKEY 257 3 13 mdsswUyr3DPW132mOi8V9xESWE8jTo0dxCjjnopKl+GqJxpVXckHAeF+KkxLbxILfDLUT0rAK9iUzy1L53eKGQ==            
cornubot.se.     300 MX 15 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com.            
cornubot.se.     300 MX 20 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com.            
cornubot.se.     300 MX 10 aspmx.l.google.com.            
cornubot.se.     86400 NS kristin.ns.cloudflare.com.            
cornubot.se.     86400 NS graham.ns.cloudflare.com.            
cornubot.se.     1800 SOA graham.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2376076031 10000 2400 604800 1800            
cornubot.se.     300 TXT "v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all"            
_dmarc.cornubot.se.     300 TXT "v=DMARC1; p=quarantine"            

Backing DNS Queries

Below are all DNS queries we submitted while inspecting the resource records.

ID Server Question Name Type Status

DNSSEC

DNSSEC is an extension of the DNS protocol that provides cryptographic assurance of the authenticity and integrity of responses; it's intended as a defense against network attackers who are able to manipulate DNS to redirect their victims to servers of their choice. DNSSEC is controversial, with the industry split largely between those who think it's essential and those who believe that it's problematic and unnecessary.

Test passed
Everything seems to be well configured. Well done.

Analysis

Good
DNSSEC is well configured
Good. This domain name has well-configured DNSSEC.

Useful DNSSEC Tools

Certification Authority Authorization

CAA (RFC 8659) is a new standard that allows domain name owners to restrict which CAs are allowed to issue certificates for their domains. This can help to reduce the chance of misissuance, either accidentally or maliciously. In September 2017, CAA became mandatory for CAs to implement.

Feature not applicable, not implemented, or disabled
Your server doesn't support this feature.

Analysis

Powerup!
There is no CAA policy on this domain
CAA policies can be used to restrict which CAs are allowed to issue certificates for a hostname. As such, CAA can be used to enforce an organization-wide policy and to prevent issuance of unauthorized certificates. The CA/Browser forum requires CAs to consult CAA configuration during certificate issuance from September 2017.

Email (SMTP)

An internet hostname can be served by zero or more mail servers, as specified by MX (mail exchange) DNS resource records. Each server can further resolve to multiple IP addresses, for example to handle IPv4 and IPv6 clients. Thus, in practice, hosts that wish to receive email reliably are supported by many endpoint.

Test passed
Everything seems to be well configured. Well done.
Server Preference Operational STARTTLS TLS PKI DNSSEC DANE
aspmx.l.google.com
142.251.179.26
PTR: pd-in-f26.1e100.net
10
220 mx.google.com ESMTP d75a77b69052e-4a994af414csi142454341cf.515 - gsmtp

EHLO outbound.hardenize.com
250-mx.google.com at your service, [172.99.67.55]
250-SIZE 157286400
250-8BITMIME
250-STARTTLS
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-PIPELINING
250-CHUNKING
250 SMTPUTF8

STARTTLS
220 2.0.0 Ready to start TLS
Supports STARTTLS. Not supported. Not applicable,
requires TLS.
alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
172.253.116.27
PTR: dj-in-f27.1e100.net
15
220 mx.google.com ESMTP 5b1f17b1804b1-454d505e3dfsi16795095e9.163 - gsmtp

EHLO outbound.hardenize.com
250-mx.google.com at your service, [172.99.67.55]
250-SIZE 157286400
250-8BITMIME
250-STARTTLS
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-PIPELINING
250-CHUNKING
250 SMTPUTF8

STARTTLS
220 2.0.0 Ready to start TLS
Supports STARTTLS. Not supported. Not applicable,
requires TLS.
alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
173.194.76.27
PTR: ws-in-f27.1e100.net
20
220 mx.google.com ESMTP 5b1f17b1804b1-454d50c7546si16759435e9.97 - gsmtp

EHLO outbound.hardenize.com
250-mx.google.com at your service, [172.99.67.55]
250-SIZE 157286400
250-8BITMIME
250-STARTTLS
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-PIPELINING
250-CHUNKING
250 SMTPUTF8

STARTTLS
220 2.0.0 Ready to start TLS
Supports STARTTLS. Not supported. Not applicable,
requires TLS.

Analysis

Notice
Limited testing of third-party SMTP servers
We employ limited testing of third-party SMTP servers because they tend to be used by a great many domain names. Because we also continuously test a great many domain names, we want to avoid sending too many near-identical connections to these SMTP servers. It doesn't serve a practical purpose and also tends to get us on their bad side. TLS protocol testing, in particular, requires a lot of connections, which mean that we're often treated like spammers, even though we don't send any email. When testing third-party servers we may check only IP address per SMTP destination. When this is the case, the list of IP addresses shown here may not be complete. Further, in some situations with top services, we may show only the TLS configuration from a representative sample of their servers.
Notice
Some SMTP server assessments contain partial information
Comprehensive TLS assessments require many connections, which is exactly what many SMTP servers don't like. We implement a two-tier assessment approach. To give you some results as fast as possible, we perform shallow assessments that use only one connection per SMTP server. We then have a background process that performs complete assessments slowly, trying to accommodate each server individually. The results presented here contain partial information. If you come back later we may be able to provide complete assessment results.

Email TLS (SMTP)

Transport Layer Security (TLS) is the most widely used encryption protocol on the Internet. In combination with valid certificates, servers can establish trusted communication channels even with users who have never visited them before. Network attackers can't uncover what is being communicated, even when they can see all the traffic.

Test passed
Everything seems to be well configured. Well done.

TLS Configuration: aspmx.l.google.com (142.251.179.26)

Encryption protocol version determines what features are
available for negotiation between client and server.
Supported protocols
TLS v1.2
Shows cipher suite configuration for this protocol version.TLS v1.2 Suite: TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
Suite ID: 0xcca9
Cipher name: CHACHA20
Cipher strength: 256 bits
Cipher mode: AEAD
Key exchange: ECDHE_ECDSA
Key exchange strength: EC ecdh_x25519 (256 bits)
Forward secrecy: Yes
PRF: SHA256
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
 256 bits (ECDHE 256 bits)

Analysis

Good
TLS 1.2 supported
Good. This server supports TLS 1.2, which can provide strong security when configured correctly. This version of the TLS protocol is necessary to provide good security with a wide range of clients that don't yet support TLS 1.3.
Good
Strong key exchange detected
Excellent. All cipher suites on this server rely on strong key exchange. The sweet spot is 2048 bits for DHE and 256 bits for ECDHE. Putting ECDHE suites first guarantees best security and best performance.
Notice
Partial results shown
SMTP assessments usually take a long time. To get you some results faster, we initially perform shallow checks. If you come back later we may be able to show you complete results.
Notice
Relaxed TLS assessment criteria applied to SMTP on port 25
We apply relaxed assessment criteria when evaluating TLS configuration of SMTP servers on port 25. This is because most delivery agents fall back to delivering via plaintext on failure to negotiate encryption. Some configuration elements that can be abused to attack other ports and protocols (e.g., SSLv2 and export cipher suites) are penalized in the same way as for other protocols. We will review this policy in the future.

TLS Configuration: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com (172.253.116.27)

Encryption protocol version determines what features are
available for negotiation between client and server.
Supported protocols
TLS v1.2
Shows cipher suite configuration for this protocol version.TLS v1.2 Suite: TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
Suite ID: 0xcca9
Cipher name: CHACHA20
Cipher strength: 256 bits
Cipher mode: AEAD
Key exchange: ECDHE_ECDSA
Key exchange strength: EC ecdh_x25519 (256 bits)
Forward secrecy: Yes
PRF: SHA256
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
 256 bits (ECDHE 256 bits)

Analysis

Good
TLS 1.2 supported
Good. This server supports TLS 1.2, which can provide strong security when configured correctly. This version of the TLS protocol is necessary to provide good security with a wide range of clients that don't yet support TLS 1.3.
Good
Strong key exchange detected
Excellent. All cipher suites on this server rely on strong key exchange. The sweet spot is 2048 bits for DHE and 256 bits for ECDHE. Putting ECDHE suites first guarantees best security and best performance.
Notice
Partial results shown
SMTP assessments usually take a long time. To get you some results faster, we initially perform shallow checks. If you come back later we may be able to show you complete results.
Notice
Relaxed TLS assessment criteria applied to SMTP on port 25
We apply relaxed assessment criteria when evaluating TLS configuration of SMTP servers on port 25. This is because most delivery agents fall back to delivering via plaintext on failure to negotiate encryption. Some configuration elements that can be abused to attack other ports and protocols (e.g., SSLv2 and export cipher suites) are penalized in the same way as for other protocols. We will review this policy in the future.

TLS Configuration: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com (173.194.76.27)

Encryption protocol version determines what features are
available for negotiation between client and server.
Supported protocols
TLS v1.2
Shows cipher suite configuration for this protocol version.TLS v1.2 Suite: TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
Suite ID: 0xcca9
Cipher name: CHACHA20
Cipher strength: 256 bits
Cipher mode: AEAD
Key exchange: ECDHE_ECDSA
Key exchange strength: EC ecdh_x25519 (256 bits)
Forward secrecy: Yes
PRF: SHA256
TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
 256 bits (ECDHE 256 bits)

Analysis

Good
TLS 1.2 supported
Good. This server supports TLS 1.2, which can provide strong security when configured correctly. This version of the TLS protocol is necessary to provide good security with a wide range of clients that don't yet support TLS 1.3.
Good
Strong key exchange detected
Excellent. All cipher suites on this server rely on strong key exchange. The sweet spot is 2048 bits for DHE and 256 bits for ECDHE. Putting ECDHE suites first guarantees best security and best performance.
Notice
Partial results shown
SMTP assessments usually take a long time. To get you some results faster, we initially perform shallow checks. If you come back later we may be able to show you complete results.
Notice
Relaxed TLS assessment criteria applied to SMTP on port 25
We apply relaxed assessment criteria when evaluating TLS configuration of SMTP servers on port 25. This is because most delivery agents fall back to delivering via plaintext on failure to negotiate encryption. Some configuration elements that can be abused to attack other ports and protocols (e.g., SSLv2 and export cipher suites) are penalized in the same way as for other protocols. We will review this policy in the future.

Email Certificates (SMTP)

A certificate is a digital document that contains a public key, some information about the entity associated with it, and a digital signature from the certificate issuer. It’s a mechanism that enables us to exchange, store, and use public keys. Being able to reliably verify the identity of a remote server is crucial in order to achieve secure encrypted communication.

Test passed
Everything seems to be well configured. Well done.

Certificate #1

Leaf certificate mx.google.com
Issuer: Google Trust Services LLC
Not Before: 17 Jun 2025 20:02:56 UTC
Not After: 09 Sep 2025 20:02:55 UTC (expires in 2 months 55 minutes)
Key: EC 256 bits
Signature: SHA256withRSA
 View details

Analysis

Good
Strong private key
Good. The private key associated with this certificate is secure.
Good
Strong signature algorithm
Good. This certificate uses a strong signature algorithm.
Good
Certificate matches hostname
Good. The provided certificate matches the expected hostnames.
Good
Certificate dates match
Good. The certificate is valid for use at this point of time.
Good
Certificate has not been revoked
Good. This certificate has not been revoked.
Good
Certificate satisfies Apple's CT compliance requirements
Good. This certificate satisfies Apple's CT requirements at present.

Certificate Chain

Leaf certificate
mx.google.com | 3e01892
Not After: 09 Sep 2025 20:02:55 UTC (expires in 2 months 55 minutes)
Authentication: EC 256 bits (SHA256withRSA)
 View details
Intermediate certificate
WR2 | e6fe22b
Not After: 20 Feb 2029 14:00:00 UTC (expires in 3 years 7 months)
Authentication: RSA 2048 bits (SHA256withRSA)
 View details
Intermediate certificate
GTS Root R1 | 3ee0278
Not After: 28 Jan 2028 00:00:42 UTC (expires in 2 years 6 months)
Authentication: RSA 4096 bits (SHA256withRSA)
 View details
Root certificate
GlobalSign Root CA | ebd4104
Not After: 28 Jan 2028 12:00:00 UTC (expires in 2 years 6 months)
Authentication: RSA 2048 bits (SHA1withRSA)
 View details

Analysis

Good
Certificate chain is correct
Good. This chain contains all the right certificates and in the right order.

Email DANE (SMTP)

DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) is a bridge between DNSSEC and TLS. In one possible scenario, DANE can be used for public key pinning, building on an existing publicly-trusted certificate. In another approach, it can be used to completely bypass the CA ecosystem and establish trust using DNSSEC alone.

Feature not applicable, not implemented, or disabled
Your server doesn't support this feature.

SPF

Sender Policy Framework (SPF) is a protocol that allows domain name owners to control which internet hosts are allowed to send email on their behalf. This simple mechanism can be used to reduce the effect of email spoofing and cut down on spam.

Test passed
Everything seems to be well configured. Well done.

SPF Policy Information Main policy

Host where this policy is located.Location cornubot.se
SPF version used by this policy.v spf1
Evaluates SPF policy specified in another DNS location. This
directive is typically used to allow hosts controlled by
another organization.
include
_spf.google.com
This policy element always matches. It's normally used
at the end of a policy to specify the handling of hosts
that don't match earlier mechanisms.
-all

Analysis

Info
SPF policy found

Policy text: v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

Location: cornubot.se

Good
SPF policy is valid
Good. Your SPF policy is syntactically valid.
Good
Policy uses default fail
Excellent. This policy fails hosts that are not allowed to send email for this domain name.
Good
Policy DNS lookups under limit
Good. Your policy stays under the limit of up to 10 DNS queries. The SPF specification Section 4.6.4. requires implementations to limit the total number of DNS queries. Policies that exceed the limit should not be used and may not work in practice.

Lookups: 4

SPF Policy Information Included policy

Host where this policy is located.Location _spf.google.com
SPF version used by this policy.v spf1
Evaluates SPF policy specified in another DNS location. This
directive is typically used to allow hosts controlled by
another organization.
include
_netblocks.google.com
Evaluates SPF policy specified in another DNS location. This
directive is typically used to allow hosts controlled by
another organization.
include
_netblocks2.google.com
Evaluates SPF policy specified in another DNS location. This
directive is typically used to allow hosts controlled by
another organization.
include
_netblocks3.google.com
This policy element always matches. It's normally used
at the end of a policy to specify the handling of hosts
that don't match earlier mechanisms.
~all

SPF Policy Information Included policy

Host where this policy is located.Location _netblocks.google.com
SPF version used by this policy.v spf1
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv4 network.
ip4
66.249.80.0/20
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv4 network.
ip4
72.14.192.0/18
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv4 network.
ip4
74.125.0.0/16
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv4 network.
ip4
108.177.8.0/21
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv4 network.
ip4
173.194.0.0/16
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv4 network.
ip4
209.85.128.0/17
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv4 network.
ip4
216.58.192.0/19
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv4 network.
ip4
216.239.32.0/19
This policy element always matches. It's normally used
at the end of a policy to specify the handling of hosts
that don't match earlier mechanisms.
~all

SPF Policy Information Included policy

Host where this policy is located.Location _netblocks2.google.com
SPF version used by this policy.v spf1
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv6 network.
ip6
2001:4860:4000::/36
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv6 network.
ip6
2404:6800:4000::/36
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv6 network.
ip6
2607:f8b0:4000::/36
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv6 network.
ip6
2800:3f0:4000::/36
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv6 network.
ip6
2a00:1450:4000::/36
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv6 network.
ip6
2c0f:fb50:4000::/36
This policy element always matches. It's normally used
at the end of a policy to specify the handling of hosts
that don't match earlier mechanisms.
~all

SPF Policy Information Included policy

Host where this policy is located.Location _netblocks3.google.com
SPF version used by this policy.v spf1
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv4 network.
ip4
172.217.0.0/19
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv4 network.
ip4
172.217.32.0/20
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv4 network.
ip4
172.217.128.0/19
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv4 network.
ip4
172.217.160.0/20
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv4 network.
ip4
172.217.192.0/19
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv4 network.
ip4
172.253.56.0/21
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv4 network.
ip4
172.253.112.0/20
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv4 network.
ip4
108.177.96.0/19
This policy element always matches. It's normally used
at the end of a policy to specify the handling of hosts
that don't match earlier mechanisms.
~all

DMARC

Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) is a scalable mechanism by which a mail-originating organization can express domain-level policies and preferences for message validation, disposition, and reporting, that a mail-receiving organization can use to improve mail handling.

Test passed
Everything seems to be well configured. Well done.

DMARC Policy Information

The location from which we obtained this policy.Policy location _dmarc.cornubot.se
DMARC version used by this policy.v DMARC1
Indicates the policy to be enacted by the receiver at
the request of the domain owner. Possible values are:
none, quarantine, and reject.
p
quarantine

Analysis

Info
DMARC policy found

Policy: v=DMARC1; p=quarantine

Host: _dmarc.cornubot.se

Good
Policy is valid
Good. You have a valid DMARC policy.

MTA Strict Transport Security

SMTP Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security (MTA-STS) is a mechanism enabling mail service providers to declare their ability to receive Transport Layer Security (TLS) secure SMTP connections, and to specify whether sending SMTP servers should refuse to deliver to MX hosts that do not offer TLS with a trusted server certificate.

Feature not applicable, not implemented, or disabled
Your server doesn't support this feature.

SMTP TLS Reporting

SMTP TLS Reporting (RFC 8460), or TLS-RPT for short, describes a reporting mechanism and format by which systems sending email can share statistics and specific information about potential failures with recipient domains. Recipient domains can then use this information to both detect potential attacks and diagnose unintentional misconfigurations. TLS-RPT can be used with DANE or MTA-STS.

Feature not applicable, not implemented, or disabled
Your server doesn't support this feature.

HTTP (80)

To observe your HTTP implementation, we submit a request to the homepage of your site on port 80, follow all redirections (even when they take us to other domain names), and record the returned HTTP headers.

Unable to test (dependency failed)
This test depends on the results of another test, which hasn't completed.

URL: http://cornubot.se/

Analysis

Warning
HTTP connection failed
We were not able to successfully complete this request.

Message: Unable to resolve hostname: cornubot.se

HTTP (443)

To observe your HTTPS implementation, we submit a request to the homepage of your site on port 443, follow all redirections (even when they take us to other domain names), and record the returned HTTP headers. We use the most recent set of headers returned from the tested hostname for further tests such as HSTS and HPKP.

Unable to test (dependency failed)
This test depends on the results of another test, which hasn't completed.

URL: https://cornubot.se/

Analysis

Warning
HTTP connection failed
We were not able to successfully complete this request.

Message: Unable to resolve hostname: cornubot.se

WWW TLS

Transport Layer Security (TLS) is the most widely used encryption protocol on the Internet. In combination with valid certificates, servers can establish trusted communication channels even with users who have never visited them before. Network attackers can't uncover what is being communicated, even when they can see all the traffic.

Unable to test (dependency failed)
This test depends on the results of another test, which hasn't completed.

WWW Certificates

A certificate is a digital document that contains a public key, some information about the entity associated with it, and a digital signature from the certificate issuer. It’s a mechanism that enables us to exchange, store, and use public keys. Being able to reliably verify the identity of a remote server is crucial in order to achieve secure encrypted communication.

Unable to test (dependency failed)
This test depends on the results of another test, which hasn't completed.

DANE (443)

DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) is a bridge between DNSSEC and TLS. In one possible scenario, DANE can be used for public key pinning, building on an existing publicly-trusted certificate. In another approach, it can be used to completely bypass the CA ecosystem and establish trust using DNSSEC alone.

Feature not applicable, not implemented, or disabled
Your server doesn't support this feature.

Cookies

Cookies are small chunks of text that are sent between your browser and a website. They are often essential to the operation of the site and sometimes contain sensitive information. Session cookies sent from secure sites must be explicitly marked as secure to prevent being obtained by active network attackers.

Unable to test (dependency failed)
This test depends on the results of another test, which hasn't completed.

HTML Content

On virtually all web sites, HTML markup, images, style sheets, JavaScript, and other page resources arrive not only over multiple connections but possibly from multiple servers and sites spread across the entire Internet. For a page to be properly encrypted, it’s necessary that all the content is retrieved over HTTPS. In practice, that’s very often not the case, leading to mixed content security problems.

Unable to test (dependency failed)
This test depends on the results of another test, which hasn't completed.

HTTP Strict Transport Security

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) vastly improves security of the network encryption layer. With HSTS enabled, browsers no longer allow clicking through certificate warnings errors, which are typically trivial to exploit. Additionally, they will no longer submit insecure (plaintext) requests to the site in question, even if asked.

Unable to test (dependency failed)
This test depends on the results of another test, which hasn't completed.

HSTS Policy  Main host

URL from which this policy was obtained.Location https://cornubot.se

HTTP Public Key Pinning

HTTP Public Key Pinning (HPKP) enables site operators to restrict which certificates are considered valid for their domain names. With a valid HPKP configuration, sites can defeat man in the middle (MITM) attacks using fraudulent or misissued certificates. HPKP is an advanced feature, suitable for use by only high-profile web sites.

Unable to test (dependency failed)
This test depends on the results of another test, which hasn't completed.

Content Security Policy

Content Security Policy (CSP) is a security mechanism that allows web sites control how browsers process their pages. In essence, sites can restrict what types of resources are loaded and from where. CSP policies can be used to defend against cross-site scripting, prevent mixed content issues, as well as report violations for investigation.

Unable to test (dependency failed)
This test depends on the results of another test, which hasn't completed.

Subresource Integrity

Subresource Integrity (SRI) is a new standard that enables browsers to verify the integrity of embedded page resources (e.g., scripts and stylesheets) when they are loaded from third-party web sites. With SRI deployed, remote resources can be used safely, without fear of them being modified by malicious parties.

Unable to test (dependency failed)
This test depends on the results of another test, which hasn't completed.

Expect CT

Expect-CT is a deprecated response HTTP header designed to enable web sites to monitor problems related to their Certificate Transparency (CT) compliance. Should any CT issues arise, browsers that supported this header will submit reports to the specified reporting endpoint. Chrome was the browser that introduced support for this response header, but later deprecated it and removed it in version 107.

Unable to test (dependency failed)
This test depends on the results of another test, which hasn't completed.

Frame Options

The X-Frame-Options header controls page framing, which occurs when a page is incorporated into some other page, possibly on a different site. If framing is allowed, attackers can employ clever tricks to make victims perform arbitrary actions on your site; they do this by showing their web site while forwarding the victim's clicks to yours.

Unable to test (dependency failed)
This test depends on the results of another test, which hasn't completed.

XSS Protection

Some browsers ship with so-called XSS Auditors, built-in defenses against XSS. Although these defenses work against simple reflective XSS attacks, they can be abused by skillful attackers to add weaknesses to otherwise secure web sites. These dangers are present in both filtering and blocking modes. At this time, the Safari browser ships with its XSS defenses enabled by default. For this reason, the best approach is to explicitly disable this functionality.

Unable to test (dependency failed)
This test depends on the results of another test, which hasn't completed.

Content Type Options

Some browsers use a technique called content sniffing to override response MIME types provided by HTTP servers and interpret responses as something else (usually HTML). This behavior, which could potentially lead to security issues, should be disabled by attaching an X-Content-Type-Options header to all responses.

Unable to test (dependency failed)
This test depends on the results of another test, which hasn't completed.