Web Security Overview
Supported and well configured
HTTPS

Web sites need to use encryption to help their visitors know they're in the right place, as well as provide confidentiality and content integrity. Sites that don't support HTTPS may expose sensitive data and have their pages modified and subverted.

For all sites VERY IMPORTANT medium EFFORT
Supported and well configured
HTTPS Redirection

To deploy HTTPS properly, web sites must redirect all unsafe (plaintext) traffic to the encrypted variant. This approach ensures that no sensitive data is exposed and that further security technologies can be activated.

For all sites VERY IMPORTANT low EFFORT
Not supported
HTTP Strict Transport Security

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is an HTTPS extension that instructs browsers to remember sites that use encryption and enforce strict security requirements. Without HSTS, active network attacks are easy to carry out.

For important sites VERY IMPORTANT medium EFFORT
Not supported
HSTS Preloaded

HSTS Preloading is informing browsers in advance about a site's use of HSTS, which means that strict security can be enforced even on the first visit. This approach provides best HTTPS security available today.

For important sites VERY IMPORTANT medium EFFORT
Not supported
Content Security Policy

Content Security Policy (CSP) is an additional security layer that enables web sites to control browser behavior, creating a safety net that can counter attacks such as cross-site scripting.

For important sites IMPORTANT high EFFORT
Email Security Overview
Unable to determine
STARTTLS

All hosts that receive email need encryption to ensure confidentiality of email messages. Email servers thus need to support STARTTLS, as well as provide decent TLS configuration and correct certificates.
Unable to determine STARTTLS status.

For all sites VERY IMPORTANT low EFFORT
Supported and well configured
SPF

Sender Policy Framework (SPF) enables organizations to designate servers that are allowed to send email messages on their behalf. With SPF in place, spam is easier to identify.

For important sites IMPORTANT low EFFORT
Not supported
DMARC

Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) is a mechanism that allows organizations to specify how unauthenticated email (identified using SPF and DKIM) should be handled.

For important sites IMPORTANT low EFFORT

DNS Zone

The global DNS infrastructure is organized as a series of hierarchical DNS zones. The root zone hosts a number of global and country TLDs, which in turn host further zones that are delegated to their customers. Each organization that controls a zone can delegate parts of its namespace to other zones. In this test we perform detailed inspection of a DNS zone, but only if the host being tested matches the zone.

Test passed
Everything seems to be well configured. Well done.

Nameserver Names

Nameservers can be referred to by name and by address. In this section we show the names, which can appear in the NS records, the referrals from the parent zone, and the SOA record. In some situations, servers from the parent zone respond authoritatively, in which case we will include them in the list as well.

Nameserver Operational IPv4 IPv6 Sources
ns31.scs-ns.ch. PRIMARY
194.209.158.65
The server is online. Name resolves to an IPv4 address. Name doesn't resolve to an IPv6 address. NS SOA REFERRAL
ns32.scs-ns.org.
194.209.159.65
The server is online. Name resolves to an IPv4 address. Name doesn't resolve to an IPv6 address. NS REFERRAL
ns33.scs-ns.net.
194.209.158.65
194.209.159.65
The server is online. Name resolves to an IPv4 address. Name doesn't resolve to an IPv6 address. NS REFERRAL

Nameserver Addresses

This section shows the configuration of all discovered nameservers by their IP address. To find all applicable nameservers, we inspect the parent zone nameservers for names and glue and then the tested zone nameservers for NS records. We then resolve all discovered names to IP addresses. Finally, we test each address individually.

Nameserver Operational Authoritative Recursive UDP TCP Sources Payload Size
194.209.158.65 PRIMARY
ns31.scs-ns.ch.
ns33.scs-ns.net.
PTR: v4scs011.ansp.bluewin.org.
The server appears to be online. Nameserver provides authoritative responses Nameserver doesn't provide recursive service Nameserver responds to UDP queries Nameserver responds to TCP queries NAME 1232
194.209.159.65
ns33.scs-ns.net.
ns32.scs-ns.org.
PTR: v4scs012.ansp.bluewin.org.
The server appears to be online. Nameserver provides authoritative responses Nameserver doesn't provide recursive service Nameserver responds to UDP queries Nameserver responds to TCP queries NAME 1232

Start of Authority (SOA) Record

Start of Authority (SOA) records contain administrative information pertaining to one DNS zone, especially the configuration that's used for zone transfers between the primary nameserver and the secondaries. Only one SOA record should exist, with all nameservers providing the same information.

The domain name of the primary nameserver for the zone. Also known as MNAME.Primary nameserver ns31.scs-ns.ch.
Email address of the persons responsible for this zone. Also known as RNAME.Admin email admin\.dns.swisscom.com.
Zone serial or version number.Serial number 2023054546
The length of time secondary nameservers should wait before querying the primary for changes.Refresh interval 14,400 seconds (about 4 hours)
The length of time secondary nameservers should wait before querying an unresponsive primary again.Retry interval 3,600 seconds (about 1 hour)
The length of time after which secondary nameservers should stop responding to queries for a zone, assuming no updates were obtained from the primary.Expire interval 2,419,200 seconds (about 28 days)
TTL for purposes of negative response caching. Negative cache TTL 300 seconds (about 5 minutes)
Time To Live (TTL) indicates for how long a record remains valid. SOA record TTL 43,200 seconds (about 12 hours)

Analysis

Powerup!
Nameserver A and AAAA records should have matching reverse records
According to RFC 1912, nameserver's PTR records must match their A and AAAA records to ensure maximum interoperability.
Powerup!
Improve IPv6 support
The Internet is in a slow transition to supporting IPv6 widely. Although at this time it is expected that most recursive DNS servers will use IPv4, adding support for IPv6 will enable transition to networks that use IPv6 exclusively.
Good
No problems detected with the zone configuration
Excellent. This DNS zone is in a good working order. No problems detected.

Backing DNS Queries

Below are all DNS queries we submitted during the zone inspection.

ID Server Transport Question Name Type Status

DNS Records

Correctly functioning name servers are necessary to hold and distribute information that's necessary for your domain name to operate correctly. Examples include converting names to IP addresses, determining where email should go, and so on. More recently, the DNS is being used to communicate email and other security policies.

Test passed
Everything seems to be well configured. Well done.

DNS Records

These are the results of individual DNS queries against your nameserver for common resource record types.

Name TTL Type Data
bluewin.ch.     300 A 213.3.75.39            
www.bluewin.ch.     43200 CNAME bluewin.ch.            
bluewin.ch.     43200 MX 10 mx02.p.bluenet.ch.            
bluewin.ch.     43200 MX 10 mx01.p.bluenet.ch.            
bluewin.ch.     43200 NS ns32.scs-ns.org.            
bluewin.ch.     43200 NS ns31.scs-ns.ch.            
bluewin.ch.     43200 NS ns33.scs-ns.net.            
bluewin.ch.     43200 SOA ns31.scs-ns.ch. admin\.dns.swisscom.com. 2023054546 14400 3600 2419200 300            
bluewin.ch.     43200 TXT "google-site-verification=EEUONgYGh1ESO9rDXQgyp5Zyw2TRyVvqKP8HNlheZ0g"            
bluewin.ch.     43200 TXT "google-site-verification=hDMeAPW2NXGCxfvVrfy7bAtl86Rihi6rV40wgTsu_Kc"            
bluewin.ch.     43200 TXT "v=spf1 redirect=_spf.bluewin.ch"            
bluewin.ch.     43200 TXT "facebook-domain-verification=ab7oyrumx2nah637hyblyxdl9xl2ug"            
bluewin.ch.     43200 TXT "google-site-verification=7A132hDBdbgzpX2gCSchxGPAC6MHsWDYU5aLa5_5-Mc"            
bluewin.ch.     43200 TXT "swisssign-check=ocSfhMyYu0FXotufnCQ6MaSM04Y"            
_dmarc.bluewin.ch.     43200 TXT "v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc.reports@bluewin.ch; ri=86400; adkim=s; aspf=s;"            

Backing DNS Queries

Below are all DNS queries we submitted while inspecting the resource records.

ID Server Question Name Type Status

DNSSEC

DNSSEC is an extension of the DNS protocol that provides cryptographic assurance of the authenticity and integrity of responses; it's intended as a defense against network attackers who are able to manipulate DNS to redirect their victims to servers of their choice. DNSSEC is controversial, with the industry split largely between those who think it's essential and those who believe that it's problematic and unnecessary.

Feature not applicable, not implemented, or disabled
Your server doesn't support this feature.

Useful DNSSEC Tools

Certification Authority Authorization

CAA (RFC 8659) is a new standard that allows domain name owners to restrict which CAs are allowed to issue certificates for their domains. This can help to reduce the chance of misissuance, either accidentally or maliciously. In September 2017, CAA became mandatory for CAs to implement.

Feature not applicable, not implemented, or disabled
Your server doesn't support this feature.

Analysis

Powerup!
There is no CAA policy on this domain
CAA policies can be used to restrict which CAs are allowed to issue certificates for a hostname. As such, CAA can be used to enforce an organization-wide policy and to prevent issuance of unauthorized certificates. The CA/Browser forum requires CAs to consult CAA configuration during certificate issuance from September 2017.

Email (SMTP)

An internet hostname can be served by zero or more mail servers, as specified by MX (mail exchange) DNS resource records. Each server can further resolve to multiple IP addresses, for example to handle IPv4 and IPv6 clients. Thus, in practice, hosts that wish to receive email reliably are supported by many endpoint.

Unable to test (dependency failed)
This test depends on the results of another test, which hasn't completed.
Server Preference Operational STARTTLS TLS PKI DNSSEC DANE
mx01.p.bluenet.ch
16.63.85.31
PTR: ec2-16-63-85-31.eu-central-2.compute.amazonaws.com
10
554 bluewin.ch mailin-003.p.bluenet.ch Swisscom AG sc208: Blocklisting in effect - https://lookup.abusix.com/search?q=34.21.74.251
QUIT
221 2.0.0 bluewin.ch mailin-003.p.bluenet.ch Swisscom AG closing connection
Unable to determine as the SMTP server
won't accept our connection.
Unable to determine as the SMTP server
won't accept our connection.
Unable to determine as the SMTP server
won't accept our connection.
Not supported. Unable to determine as the SMTP server
won't accept our connection.
mx02.p.bluenet.ch
16.63.85.31
PTR: ec2-16-63-85-31.eu-central-2.compute.amazonaws.com
10
554 bluewin.ch mailin-004.p.bluenet.ch Swisscom AG sc208: Blocklisting in effect - https://lookup.abusix.com/search?q=34.21.74.251
QUIT
221 2.0.0 bluewin.ch mailin-004.p.bluenet.ch Swisscom AG closing connection
Unable to determine as the SMTP server
won't accept our connection.
Unable to determine as the SMTP server
won't accept our connection.
Unable to determine as the SMTP server
won't accept our connection.
Not supported. Unable to determine as the SMTP server
won't accept our connection.

Analysis

Warning
Network access blocked
One or more tests in this section couldn't complete because network access was blocked. This usually happens when there are rate limiting controls in place. SMTP servers are often very sensitive and refuse access at the slightest dislike of the client.

Error message: Blocked

Notice
Limited testing of third-party SMTP servers
We employ limited testing of third-party SMTP servers because they tend to be used by a great many domain names. Because we also continuously test a great many domain names, we want to avoid sending too many near-identical connections to these SMTP servers. It doesn't serve a practical purpose and also tends to get us on their bad side. TLS protocol testing, in particular, requires a lot of connections, which mean that we're often treated like spammers, even though we don't send any email. When testing third-party servers we may check only IP address per SMTP destination. When this is the case, the list of IP addresses shown here may not be complete. Further, in some situations with top services, we may show only the TLS configuration from a representative sample of their servers.

Email TLS (SMTP)

Transport Layer Security (TLS) is the most widely used encryption protocol on the Internet. In combination with valid certificates, servers can establish trusted communication channels even with users who have never visited them before. Network attackers can't uncover what is being communicated, even when they can see all the traffic.

Unable to test (dependency failed)
This test depends on the results of another test, which hasn't completed.

Analysis

Notice
Sensitive SMTP domain
During the report we encountered one or more SMTP servers that are known to enforce strict rate access controls. We haven't tested those servers because we are unable to complete the TLS analysis in a timely manner. In the future we will test such servers as a background activity. The information we show for the SMTP servers may not be accurate. For example, some servers do not offer STARTTLS to blacklisted clients.

Email Certificates (SMTP)

A certificate is a digital document that contains a public key, some information about the entity associated with it, and a digital signature from the certificate issuer. It’s a mechanism that enables us to exchange, store, and use public keys. Being able to reliably verify the identity of a remote server is crucial in order to achieve secure encrypted communication.

Unable to test (dependency failed)
This test depends on the results of another test, which hasn't completed.

Analysis

Notice
Sensitive SMTP domain
During the report we encountered one or more SMTP servers that are known to enforce strict rate access controls. We haven't tested those servers because we are unable to complete the TLS analysis in a timely manner. In the future we will test such servers as a background activity. The information we show for the SMTP servers may not be accurate. For example, some servers do not offer STARTTLS to blacklisted clients.

Email DANE (SMTP)

DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) is a bridge between DNSSEC and TLS. In one possible scenario, DANE can be used for public key pinning, building on an existing publicly-trusted certificate. In another approach, it can be used to completely bypass the CA ecosystem and establish trust using DNSSEC alone.

Unable to test (dependency failed)
This test depends on the results of another test, which hasn't completed.

Analysis

Notice
Sensitive SMTP domain
During the report we encountered one or more SMTP servers that are known to enforce strict rate access controls. We haven't tested those servers because we are unable to complete the TLS analysis in a timely manner. In the future we will test such servers as a background activity. The information we show for the SMTP servers may not be accurate. For example, some servers do not offer STARTTLS to blacklisted clients.

SPF

Sender Policy Framework (SPF) is a protocol that allows domain name owners to control which internet hosts are allowed to send email on their behalf. This simple mechanism can be used to reduce the effect of email spoofing and cut down on spam.

Test passed
Everything seems to be well configured. Well done.

SPF Policy Information Main policy

Host where this policy is located.Location bluewin.ch
SPF version used by this policy.v spf1
This modifier is intended for consolidating both
authorizations and policy into a common set to be
shared within a single administrative domain.
redirect
_spf.bluewin.ch

Analysis

Info
SPF policy found

Policy text: v=spf1 redirect=_spf.bluewin.ch

Location: bluewin.ch

Good
SPF policy is valid
Good. Your SPF policy is syntactically valid.
Good
Policy DNS lookups under limit
Good. Your policy stays under the limit of up to 10 DNS queries. The SPF specification Section 4.6.4. requires implementations to limit the total number of DNS queries. Policies that exceed the limit should not be used and may not work in practice.

Lookups: 1

SPF Policy Information Included policy

Host where this policy is located.Location _spf.bluewin.ch
SPF version used by this policy.v spf1
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv4 network.
ip4
193.247.246.0/24
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv4 network.
ip4
138.188.174.0/24
This mechanism tests whether the IP address being
tested is contained within a given IPv4 network.
ip4
138.188.175.0/24
This policy element always matches. It's normally used
at the end of a policy to specify the handling of hosts
that don't match earlier mechanisms.
~all

DMARC

Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) is a scalable mechanism by which a mail-originating organization can express domain-level policies and preferences for message validation, disposition, and reporting, that a mail-receiving organization can use to improve mail handling.

Feature not applicable, not implemented, or disabled
Your server doesn't support this feature.

DMARC Policy Information

The location from which we obtained this policy.Policy location _dmarc.bluewin.ch
DMARC version used by this policy.v DMARC1
Indicates the policy to be enacted by the receiver at
the request of the domain owner. Possible values are:
none, quarantine, and reject.
p
none
Percentage of messages from mail stream to
which the DMARC policy is to be applied.
pct
100
Addresses to which aggregate feedback is to be sent.rua mailto:dmarc.reports@bluewin.ch
Interval between aggregate reports. Defaults to 86400.ri 86400
Indicates whether strict or relaxed DKIM
alignment mode is required.
adkim
s
Indicates whether strict or relaxed SPF
alignment mode is required.
aspf
s

Analysis

Info
DMARC policy found

Policy: v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc.reports@bluewin.ch; ri=86400; adkim=s; aspf=s;

Host: _dmarc.bluewin.ch

Good
Policy is valid
Good. You have a valid DMARC policy.
Powerup!
Activate DMARC policy
Although syntactically valid, your DMARC policy is effectively disabled. An effective policy must set the value of the 'p' directive (or 'sp' directive when evaluating a subdomain) to either 'quarantine' or 'reject'. In addition, if the 'pct' directive is present, it must be set to a value other than zero. (The default is 100, which means to apply policy to all emails.).

MTA Strict Transport Security

SMTP Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security (MTA-STS) is a mechanism enabling mail service providers to declare their ability to receive Transport Layer Security (TLS) secure SMTP connections, and to specify whether sending SMTP servers should refuse to deliver to MX hosts that do not offer TLS with a trusted server certificate.

Feature not applicable, not implemented, or disabled
Your server doesn't support this feature.

SMTP TLS Reporting

SMTP TLS Reporting (RFC 8460), or TLS-RPT for short, describes a reporting mechanism and format by which systems sending email can share statistics and specific information about potential failures with recipient domains. Recipient domains can then use this information to both detect potential attacks and diagnose unintentional misconfigurations. TLS-RPT can be used with DANE or MTA-STS.

Feature not applicable, not implemented, or disabled
Your server doesn't support this feature.

HTTP (80)

To observe your HTTP implementation, we submit a request to the homepage of your site on port 80, follow all redirections (even when they take us to other domain names), and record the returned HTTP headers.

Test passed
Everything seems to be well configured. Well done.

URL: http://bluewin.ch/

1
http://bluewin.ch/
HTTP/1.0 302 Moved Temporarily
2
https://bluewin.ch/
HTTP/1.0 301 Moved Permanently
3
https://www.bluewin.ch/
HTTP/1.0 301 Moved Permanently
4
https://www.bluewin.ch/de/index.html
HTTP/1.1 200 OK

Analysis

Warning
Same-host permanent redirection
This is a little-bit unusual. There's a permanent redirection from a root to a specific path on the same site. This may cause problems if the subpath ever changes. A temporary redirection is more appropriate in this case.

From: https://www.bluewin.ch/

To: https://www.bluewin.ch/de/index.html

Good
HTTP redirects to HTTPS
Good. This plaintext HTTP server redirects to HTTPS.

URL: http://www.bluewin.ch/

1
http://www.bluewin.ch/
HTTP/1.0 302 Moved Temporarily
2
https://www.bluewin.ch/
HTTP/1.0 301 Moved Permanently
3
https://www.bluewin.ch/de/index.html
HTTP/1.1 200 OK

Analysis

Warning
Same-host permanent redirection
This is a little-bit unusual. There's a permanent redirection from a root to a specific path on the same site. This may cause problems if the subpath ever changes. A temporary redirection is more appropriate in this case.

From: https://www.bluewin.ch/

To: https://www.bluewin.ch/de/index.html

Good
HTTP redirects to HTTPS
Good. This plaintext HTTP server redirects to HTTPS.

HTTP (443)

To observe your HTTPS implementation, we submit a request to the homepage of your site on port 443, follow all redirections (even when they take us to other domain names), and record the returned HTTP headers. We use the most recent set of headers returned from the tested hostname for further tests such as HSTS and HPKP.

Test passed
Everything seems to be well configured. Well done.

URL: https://bluewin.ch/

1
https://bluewin.ch/
HTTP/1.0 301 Moved Permanently
2
https://www.bluewin.ch/
HTTP/1.0 301 Moved Permanently
3
https://www.bluewin.ch/de/index.html
HTTP/1.1 200 OK

Analysis

Warning
Same-host permanent redirection
This is a little-bit unusual. There's a permanent redirection from a root to a specific path on the same site. This may cause problems if the subpath ever changes. A temporary redirection is more appropriate in this case.

From: https://www.bluewin.ch/

To: https://www.bluewin.ch/de/index.html

URL: https://www.bluewin.ch/

1
https://www.bluewin.ch/
HTTP/1.0 301 Moved Permanently
2
https://www.bluewin.ch/de/index.html
HTTP/1.1 200 OK

Analysis

Warning
Same-host permanent redirection
This is a little-bit unusual. There's a permanent redirection from a root to a specific path on the same site. This may cause problems if the subpath ever changes. A temporary redirection is more appropriate in this case.

From: https://www.bluewin.ch/

To: https://www.bluewin.ch/de/index.html

WWW TLS

Transport Layer Security (TLS) is the most widely used encryption protocol on the Internet. In combination with valid certificates, servers can establish trusted communication channels even with users who have never visited them before. Network attackers can't uncover what is being communicated, even when they can see all the traffic.

Test passed
Everything seems to be well configured. Well done.

TLS Configuration: bluewin.ch (213.3.75.39)

Encryption protocol version determines what features are
available for negotiation between client and server.
Supported protocols
TLS v1.2
Servers should always enforce their own cipher
suite preference, as that is the only approach
that guarantees that the best possible suite is
selected.
Server suite preference
Shows cipher suite configuration for this protocol version.TLS v1.2 Suite: TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Suite ID: 0xc030
Cipher name: AES
Cipher strength: 256 bits
Cipher block size: 128 bits
Cipher mode: AEAD
Key exchange: ECDHE_RSA
Key exchange strength: EC secp256r1 (256 bits)
Forward secrecy: Yes
PRF: SHA384
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
 256 bits (ECDHE 256 bits)

Analysis

Powerup!
TLS 1.3 not supported
TLS 1.3 is the latest revision of the TLS protocol and a significant improvement over earlier versions. Developed over a period of several years and extensively analyzed prior to the release, TLS 1.3 removed insecure features, and improved both security and performance. This version of TLS should be the main protocol used with modern clients.
Good
TLS 1.2 supported
Good. This server supports TLS 1.2, which can provide strong security when configured correctly. This version of the TLS protocol is necessary to provide good security with a wide range of clients that don't yet support TLS 1.3.
Good
Deprecated protocols not supported
Excellent. This server doesn't support any of the deprecated protocol (TLS 1.1 and earlier).
Good
Strong key exchange detected
Excellent. All cipher suites on this server rely on strong key exchange. The sweet spot is 2048 bits for DHE and 256 bits for ECDHE. Putting ECDHE suites first guarantees best security and best performance.
Good
Only strong suites supported
Excellent. This server supports only strong cipher suites, which use strong authenticated encryption and provide forward secrecy.
Good
All TLS connections with this server satisfy Apple's CT requirements
All TLS connections established with this server satisfy Chrome's CT requirements, using certificate, TLS extension, or OCSP response as SCT transport method.

SCT transports: CERT

Good
All TLS connections with this server satisfy Chrome's CT requirements
All TLS connections established with this server satisfy Chrome's CT requirements, using certificate, TLS extension, or OCSP response as SCT transport method.

SCT transports: CERT

Notice
DHE suites not supported
This server doesn't support the Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange.

TLS Configuration: www.bluewin.ch (213.3.75.39)

Encryption protocol version determines what features are
available for negotiation between client and server.
Supported protocols
TLS v1.2
Servers should always enforce their own cipher
suite preference, as that is the only approach
that guarantees that the best possible suite is
selected.
Server suite preference
Shows cipher suite configuration for this protocol version.TLS v1.2 Suite: TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
Suite ID: 0xc030
Cipher name: AES
Cipher strength: 256 bits
Cipher block size: 128 bits
Cipher mode: AEAD
Key exchange: ECDHE_RSA
Key exchange strength: EC secp256r1 (256 bits)
Forward secrecy: Yes
PRF: SHA384
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
 256 bits (ECDHE 256 bits)

Analysis

Powerup!
TLS 1.3 not supported
TLS 1.3 is the latest revision of the TLS protocol and a significant improvement over earlier versions. Developed over a period of several years and extensively analyzed prior to the release, TLS 1.3 removed insecure features, and improved both security and performance. This version of TLS should be the main protocol used with modern clients.
Good
TLS 1.2 supported
Good. This server supports TLS 1.2, which can provide strong security when configured correctly. This version of the TLS protocol is necessary to provide good security with a wide range of clients that don't yet support TLS 1.3.
Good
Deprecated protocols not supported
Excellent. This server doesn't support any of the deprecated protocol (TLS 1.1 and earlier).
Good
Strong key exchange detected
Excellent. All cipher suites on this server rely on strong key exchange. The sweet spot is 2048 bits for DHE and 256 bits for ECDHE. Putting ECDHE suites first guarantees best security and best performance.
Good
Only strong suites supported
Excellent. This server supports only strong cipher suites, which use strong authenticated encryption and provide forward secrecy.
Good
All TLS connections with this server satisfy Apple's CT requirements
All TLS connections established with this server satisfy Chrome's CT requirements, using certificate, TLS extension, or OCSP response as SCT transport method.

SCT transports: CERT

Good
All TLS connections with this server satisfy Chrome's CT requirements
All TLS connections established with this server satisfy Chrome's CT requirements, using certificate, TLS extension, or OCSP response as SCT transport method.

SCT transports: CERT

Notice
DHE suites not supported
This server doesn't support the Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange.

WWW Certificates

A certificate is a digital document that contains a public key, some information about the entity associated with it, and a digital signature from the certificate issuer. It’s a mechanism that enables us to exchange, store, and use public keys. Being able to reliably verify the identity of a remote server is crucial in order to achieve secure encrypted communication.

Test passed
Everything seems to be well configured. Well done.

Certificate: www.bluewin.ch

Leaf certificate bluewin.ch
Issuer: SwissSign AG
Not Before: 04 Sep 2025 07:10:48 UTC
Not After: 04 Sep 2026 07:10:48 UTC (expires in 4 months 30 days)
Key: RSA 3072 bits
Signature: SHA256withRSA
 View details

Analysis

Good
Strong private key
Good. The private key associated with this certificate is secure.
Good
Strong signature algorithm
Good. This certificate uses a strong signature algorithm.
Good
Certificate matches hostname
Good. The provided certificate matches the expected hostnames.
Good
Certificate dates match
Good. The certificate is valid for use at this point of time.
Good
Certificate has not been revoked
Good. This certificate has not been revoked.
Good
Certificate satisfies Apple's CT compliance requirements
Good. This certificate satisfies Apple's CT requirements at present.

Certificate Trust

Determining whether a certificate is considered valid is a complicated process that depends on the exact configuration of the validating party. For trust to be established, the certificate must form a chain that ends with a trusted root. In this section we evaluate the server's certificate against major root stores.

Platform Trusted
Apple
Google AOSP
Microsoft
Mozilla

Certificate Chain

For a server certificate to be valid, it must be presented as part of a complete and valid certificate chain. The last certificate in the chain should be the root and is usually not included in the configuration.

Leaf certificate
bluewin.ch | 43d8d02
Not After: 04 Sep 2026 07:10:48 UTC (expires in 4 months 30 days)
Authentication: RSA 3072 bits (SHA256withRSA)
 View details
Intermediate certificate
SwissSign RSA TLS OV ICA 2022 - 1 | 332f9ea
Not After: 29 Jun 2036 09:34:30 UTC (expires in 10 years 2 months)
Authentication: RSA 4096 bits (SHA256withRSA)
 View details
Intermediate certificate
SwissSign RSA TLS Root CA 2022 - 1 | 288b4a9
Not After: 22 Sep 2036 11:27:11 UTC (expires in 10 years 5 months)
Authentication: RSA 4096 bits (SHA256withRSA)
 View details
Root certificate
SwissSign Gold CA - G2 | 62dd0be
Not After: 25 Oct 2036 08:30:35 UTC (expires in 10 years 6 months)
Authentication: RSA 4096 bits (SHA1withRSA)
 View details

Analysis

Good
Certificate chain is correct
Good. This chain contains all the right certificates and in the right order.

Certificate: bluewin.ch

Leaf certificate bluewin.ch
Issuer: SwissSign AG
Not Before: 04 Sep 2025 07:10:48 UTC
Not After: 04 Sep 2026 07:10:48 UTC (expires in 4 months 30 days)
Key: RSA 3072 bits
Signature: SHA256withRSA
 View details

Analysis

Good
Strong private key
Good. The private key associated with this certificate is secure.
Good
Strong signature algorithm
Good. This certificate uses a strong signature algorithm.
Good
Certificate matches hostname
Good. The provided certificate matches the expected hostnames.
Good
Certificate dates match
Good. The certificate is valid for use at this point of time.
Good
Certificate has not been revoked
Good. This certificate has not been revoked.
Good
Certificate satisfies Apple's CT compliance requirements
Good. This certificate satisfies Apple's CT requirements at present.

Certificate Trust

Determining whether a certificate is considered valid is a complicated process that depends on the exact configuration of the validating party. For trust to be established, the certificate must form a chain that ends with a trusted root. In this section we evaluate the server's certificate against major root stores.

Platform Trusted
Apple
Google AOSP
Microsoft
Mozilla

Certificate Chain

For a server certificate to be valid, it must be presented as part of a complete and valid certificate chain. The last certificate in the chain should be the root and is usually not included in the configuration.

Leaf certificate
bluewin.ch | 43d8d02
Not After: 04 Sep 2026 07:10:48 UTC (expires in 4 months 30 days)
Authentication: RSA 3072 bits (SHA256withRSA)
 View details
Intermediate certificate
SwissSign RSA TLS OV ICA 2022 - 1 | 332f9ea
Not After: 29 Jun 2036 09:34:30 UTC (expires in 10 years 2 months)
Authentication: RSA 4096 bits (SHA256withRSA)
 View details
Intermediate certificate
SwissSign RSA TLS Root CA 2022 - 1 | 288b4a9
Not After: 22 Sep 2036 11:27:11 UTC (expires in 10 years 5 months)
Authentication: RSA 4096 bits (SHA256withRSA)
 View details
Root certificate
SwissSign Gold CA - G2 | 62dd0be
Not After: 25 Oct 2036 08:30:35 UTC (expires in 10 years 6 months)
Authentication: RSA 4096 bits (SHA1withRSA)
 View details

Analysis

Good
Certificate chain is correct
Good. This chain contains all the right certificates and in the right order.

DANE (443)

DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) is a bridge between DNSSEC and TLS. In one possible scenario, DANE can be used for public key pinning, building on an existing publicly-trusted certificate. In another approach, it can be used to completely bypass the CA ecosystem and establish trust using DNSSEC alone.

Feature not applicable, not implemented, or disabled
Your server doesn't support this feature.

Cookies

Cookies are small chunks of text that are sent between your browser and a website. They are often essential to the operation of the site and sometimes contain sensitive information. Session cookies sent from secure sites must be explicitly marked as secure to prevent being obtained by active network attackers.

Test passed
Everything seems to be well configured. Well done.

HTML Content

On virtually all web sites, HTML markup, images, style sheets, JavaScript, and other page resources arrive not only over multiple connections but possibly from multiple servers and sites spread across the entire Internet. For a page to be properly encrypted, it’s necessary that all the content is retrieved over HTTPS. In practice, that’s very often not the case, leading to mixed content security problems.

Test passed
Everything seems to be well configured. Well done.

Encryption of Embedded Resources

In this section we look at the transport security of all embedded resources. Mixed active content occurs when there are unprotected scripts or styles embedded in a page. This is typically not allowed by modern browsers. Mixed passive content (images, videos and such) are typically allowed, but shouldn't be present.

5 script(s)
  5 out of 5 are secure  View all
1 CSS file(s)
  1 out of 1 are secure  View all
30 media file(s)
  30 out of 30 are secure  View all

Encryption of Outbound Links

Ideally, an encrypted page should only have links that lead to other encrypted pages. If plaintext links are used, passive network attackers can see where people go after they visit your web site. It's also possible that some sensitive information is leaked in the Referer header.

11 link(s)
  11 out of 11 are encrypted  View all

HTTP Strict Transport Security

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) vastly improves security of the network encryption layer. With HSTS enabled, browsers no longer allow clicking through certificate warnings errors, which are typically trivial to exploit. Additionally, they will no longer submit insecure (plaintext) requests to the site in question, even if asked.

Feature not applicable, not implemented, or disabled
Your server doesn't support this feature.

HSTS Policy

URL from which this policy was obtained.Location https://www.bluewin.ch/

Analysis

Powerup!
No parent protection
This host could benefit from further protection if the apex hostname would be configured with a HSTS policy that uses 'includeSubDomains'. Enabling HSTS on an entire domain name is the only approach that provides robust security.

Analysis

Powerup!
Deploy HSTS on this host
This host doesn't use HSTS, which means that its users can be easily attacked via MITM attacks. Consider deploying HSTS to disable certificate warnings and increase content and cookie security.

HTTP Public Key Pinning

HTTP Public Key Pinning (HPKP) enables site operators to restrict which certificates are considered valid for their domain names. With a valid HPKP configuration, sites can defeat man in the middle (MITM) attacks using fraudulent or misissued certificates. HPKP is an advanced feature, suitable for use by only high-profile web sites.

Feature not applicable, not implemented, or disabled
Your server doesn't support this feature.

Content Security Policy

Content Security Policy (CSP) is a security mechanism that allows web sites control how browsers process their pages. In essence, sites can restrict what types of resources are loaded and from where. CSP policies can be used to defend against cross-site scripting, prevent mixed content issues, as well as report violations for investigation.

Feature not applicable, not implemented, or disabled
Your server doesn't support this feature.

Subresource Integrity

Subresource Integrity (SRI) is a new standard that enables browsers to verify the integrity of embedded page resources (e.g., scripts and stylesheets) when they are loaded from third-party web sites. With SRI deployed, remote resources can be used safely, without fear of them being modified by malicious parties.

Feature not applicable, not implemented, or disabled
Your server doesn't support this feature.
5 script(s)
  2 out of 5 are secure
https://cdn-swisscom.push.delivery/...ebpush-production.js
https://rcp.scsstatic.ch/...atalayer-sync-min.js
https://static.chartbeat.com/js/chartbeat_mab.js
 View all
1 CSS file(s)
  0 out of 1 are secure
https://cdn.bluewin.ch/6.3.41/styles.css
 View all

Analysis

Powerup!
SRI required
This page contains remote resources that are under the control of third parties. Deploy SRI to protect them from modification.

Expect CT

Expect-CT is a deprecated response HTTP header designed to enable web sites to monitor problems related to their Certificate Transparency (CT) compliance. Should any CT issues arise, browsers that supported this header will submit reports to the specified reporting endpoint. Chrome was the browser that introduced support for this response header, but later deprecated it and removed it in version 107.

Feature not applicable, not implemented, or disabled
Your server doesn't support this feature.

Analysis

Powerup!
Deploy Expect-CT to enable reporting
An Expect-CT policy enables web sites to monitor for any problems related to their Expect-CT compliance, detecting potentially serious issues quickly. When issues arise, compliant browsers will submit reports to the specified reporting endpoints. Before CT became required for all public certificates the Expect-CT was also used to require CT, but that use case no longer applies.

Frame Options

The X-Frame-Options header controls page framing, which occurs when a page is incorporated into some other page, possibly on a different site. If framing is allowed, attackers can employ clever tricks to make victims perform arbitrary actions on your site; they do this by showing their web site while forwarding the victim's clicks to yours.

Feature not applicable, not implemented, or disabled
Your server doesn't support this feature.

XSS Protection

Some browsers ship with so-called XSS Auditors, built-in defenses against XSS. Although these defenses work against simple reflective XSS attacks, they can be abused by skillful attackers to add weaknesses to otherwise secure web sites. These dangers are present in both filtering and blocking modes. At this time, the Safari browser ships with its XSS defenses enabled by default. For this reason, the best approach is to explicitly disable this functionality.

Feature not applicable, not implemented, or disabled
Your server doesn't support this feature.

Analysis

Powerup!
Explicitly disable browser XSS protection
For best security, every web site should explicitly disable browser-based XSS protection. This is because this type of functionality can be used to introduce vulnerabilities into otherwise error-free web sites.

Content Type Options

Some browsers use a technique called content sniffing to override response MIME types provided by HTTP servers and interpret responses as something else (usually HTML). This behavior, which could potentially lead to security issues, should be disabled by attaching an X-Content-Type-Options header to all responses.

Feature not applicable, not implemented, or disabled
Your server doesn't support this feature.